
Legal News › Banking, DRT & Recovery Explained
The Delhi High Court has held that a bank cannot quietly cut interest on a court-ordered fixed deposit. Here is what it means for ordinary depositors.
Key points
- A Delhi High Court bench dismissed NatWest’s appeal. The bank had cut interest on a Rs 5.89 crore court-ordered fixed deposit (FDR) from over 7% to 3.5%.
- The court said the bank gave no proof that it cut the rate the same way for all similar deposits. It also did not tell the depositor.
- The bank must now pay interest at the average of the previous three years’ rates from 30 January 2018, as reported.
- This ruling is about court-ordered deposits. But the idea of fair, equal treatment and clear notice can help any depositor who sees a sudden cut.
- If your bank changes your deposit terms, ask in writing and complain to the bank, then the RBI Ombudsman if needed.

What happened?
The Delhi High Court has ruled on a dispute over interest on a fixed deposit. A fixed deposit receipt is called an FDR. This is according to Bar & Bench, Business Standard and LiveLaw Biz.
The case is NatWest Markets PLC v. Hero Exports and another. A Division Bench of Justice Avneesh Jhingan and Justice Shail Jain decided it, as reported on 6 October 2026.
The story starts in 2008. In a business dispute between two companies, the High Court ordered that Rs 5.89 crore be kept safe.
The money sat in an FDR with a bank, now called NatWest. The court said it should earn the maximum interest.
Why did the interest drop?
As reported, the FDR earned 7.75%, then 8.25%, then 7.75% until 30 January 2018. After that, the bank cut the rate to 3.5%.
A single judge ordered the bank to pay more. The bank then appealed to a Division Bench.
The bank said a Reserve Bank of India (RBI) circular lets banks set their own deposit rates. The bench agreed that banks have this freedom. But it said the freedom has a limit: banks cannot treat similar deposits differently.
Also read | Bank Auction Cancelled by Supreme Court: What Are a Borrower's Rights Under the SARFAESI Act?
What did the court say?
According to the reports, the bench found three problems.
First, the bank gave no material to show that it cut the rate to 3.5% for all similar deposits. Second, it did not show that it told the depositors the FDR had matured or that the rate would fall. Third, a court-ordered deposit needs extra care, because the money is kept to protect someone’s claim.
The court dismissed the appeal. Interest from 30 January 2018 is to be worked out at the average of the rates of the three years before that date, as reported. The bank must also deposit the money with the court’s Registrar General.
Sections involved

Does this help an ordinary depositor?
Not directly. This ruling is about a deposit held under a court order. It does not say every FD rate cut is wrong.
But the reasoning is useful. A bank must treat similar deposits the same way. It must also keep the depositor informed.
These ideas can help any person who feels a bank changed the terms without telling them. A normal FD has its terms on the receipt. When it matures, a new rate may apply on renewal.
So always read what your bank has told you in writing.
What happens next?
The order can be challenged in the Supreme Court. This depends on the bank. We do not know if it will do so.
For any bank-deposit dispute, the usual path is below.
What happens next
- 1Notice the cutCheck your statement and the FD receipt.
- 2Write to the bankAsk for the reason and the rule it relies on.
- 3Bank complaintUse the bank's grievance officer and keep the reply.
- 4RBI OmbudsmanIf the bank does not help, complain to the RBI Ombudsman.
- 5CourtFor large sums or court-ordered deposits, ask a lawyer about a civil case.
Rights of a depositor
A depositor has the right to know the terms of the deposit and any change in them. A depositor can ask the bank for a written reason. A depositor can also approach a court if a deposit is held under a court order.
Fixed deposit checklist
- Keep the FD receipt and every bank letter or SMS.
- Note the rate, the maturity date and the renewal rule.
- Ask in writing why a rate changed.
- Check that a court-ordered FD is renewed on time.
- Keep a record of every complaint and reply.
If this happens to you
- Write to the bank first. Ask for the rule and the date from which the lower rate applies.
- Keep proof. Receipts, statements, SMS and e-mails.
- If money is held under a court order, tell the lawyer in that case. See Delhi High Court matters.
- For a larger dispute, see civil litigation in Delhi and ask whether a recovery suit is right.
- If a court order is wrongly passed or ignored, read about an appeal.
Case at a glance
- Court
- Delhi High Court Division Bench (Justices Avneesh Jhingan and Shail Jain)
- Case
- NatWest Markets PLC v. Hero Exports and another, as reported
- What
- Interest on a Rs 5.89 crore court-ordered FDR cut from over 7% to 3.5%
- Decision
- Bank’s appeal dismissed; interest at the average of the previous three years’ rates
- Reported
- 6 October 2026
Related news
Sources
- Bar & Bench: Banks can't unilaterally reduce interest on fixed deposits maintained pursuant to court orders: Delhi High Court (6 October 2026)
- LiveLaw Biz: Delhi High Court Says NatWest Can't Reduce Interest On Rs 5.89 Crore Court-Ordered FDR Without Notice (6 October 2026)
- Business Standard: Banks cannot cut interest on court-ordered FDs arbitrarily: Delhi HC (6 October 2026)
More legal news
This explainer is general legal information based on news reports and the text of the law. It is not legal advice on any particular case, and it does not say that any person has committed an offence; allegations are decided by the courts.

