Explainer card: Swiggy Dineout Buffet Price Higher at Restaurant? Delhi Consumer Court Orders Rs 1 Lakh: What Are Your Rights? — Consumer, Legal News by Adv. Kanisth Manuja

Legal News › Consumer Explained

A Delhi consumer court told Swiggy and a restaurant to pay Rs 1 lakh over a higher buffet price. Here is what it means for you.

By Adv. Kanisth Manuja, Advocate, Delhi High CourtUpdated 5 min read

ShareWhatsAppFacebookX

Key points

  • A Delhi consumer commission ordered Swiggy and a restaurant to pay Rs 1 lakh together over a buffet price higher than the app showed, as reported on 4 October 2026.
  • The app showed Rs 1,500 for two. The restaurant charged Rs 1,050 or Rs 1,100 per person, about 40 to 47% more.
  • The commission also ordered refunds of Rs 3,988 and a Rs 254 service charge, with 9% a year interest, as reported.
  • Swiggy said it was only an ‘intermediary’ (go-between). Reports say the commission did not accept that it could escape responsibility.
  • Keep screenshots of any app price. They are your proof if the bill is different.
An empty buffet counter with brass serving dishes in a restaurant
Representative image. Photo: niyam bhushan / Flickr (CC BY 2.0)

What happened?

A Delhi consumer court has ruled against Swiggy and a Delhi restaurant, Themis Barbeque House. This is according to reports by Business Today, Bombay Samachar and Entertales on 4 October 2026.

A customer booked a buffet through Swiggy Dineout in April 2024. The app showed a ‘cost for two’ of Rs 1,500. That works out to Rs 750 a head.

At the restaurant, the reports say, the bill was Rs 1,050 per person for the vegetarian buffet and Rs 1,100 for the non-vegetarian one. That is about 40 to 47% more than the app suggested.

What did the commission order?

The District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (North District), Delhi, ordered Swiggy and the restaurant to pay Rs 1 lakh together. The money is for mental agony, harassment and the cost of the case, as reported.

It also ordered a refund of Rs 3,988 for the extra buffet charge. A further Rs 254 service charge was ordered back too. Both carry 9% interest a year.

The reports say the money must be paid within four weeks. After that, 12% a year interest applies.

Also read | Husband Hid His First Marriage? Madras High Court Upholds Maintenance for Wife: What the Law Says

Why did the commission say the price was misleading?

According to the reports, the commission found the gap was ‘material’ (big enough to matter to a buyer). It said the listing did not make clear that ‘cost for two’ was only an estimate.

It called this a misleading advertisement and an unfair trade practice (a business habit that cheats or misleads buyers) under the Consumer Protection Act. This is as reported. Only the full order shows the exact words.

Can an app say 'we are only a go-between'?

Swiggy argued that it is an intermediary (a platform that only carries information from others). It relied on Section 79 of the Information Technology Act, 2000.

Section 79 does protect an intermediary from liability for information posted by third parties. But the protection has conditions. The platform must not select or change the information, and it must follow due diligence (reasonable care).

As reported, the commission said Swiggy could not escape its duty just by quoting Section 79. It said Swiggy did not show it had taken enough care to make sure the prices shown were right.

This is one commission’s order. Other benches or appeal bodies may see a case differently.

Sections involved

IT Act s. 79
Protection from liability for an intermediary (platform), only if the conditions in the section are met. It is not an offence.
Maximum punishment: Not applicable

Is a service charge allowed?

The reports say the Rs 254 service charge on drinks was ordered to be refunded as an improper charge. They do not give the full reasoning.

Always read the bill. Ask the restaurant to explain any charge you did not expect before you pay.

What can you do if the bill is higher than the app?

First, take a screenshot of the app page before you go. Show it to the manager and ask for the listed price.

If they refuse, pay under protest if you must. Write on the bill that you paid under protest. Then keep the bill and your booking confirmation.

Next, send a written complaint to the restaurant and the app. If there is no fix, you can file a case before the District Consumer Commission. Many people file without a lawyer.

A smartphone lying on a grey carpet with its screen lit
Representative image. Photo: Prophetic_Blogger / Flickr (CC BY 2.0)

What happens next

  1. 1Spot the gapCompare the app price with the bill. Take screenshots.
  2. 2Raise itShow the manager the listing. Pay under protest if needed.
  3. 3Written complaintEmail the restaurant and the app. Keep proof.
  4. 4Consumer caseFile before the District Consumer Commission.
  5. 5HearingBoth sides give papers. The commission hears the case.
  6. 6OrderThe commission can order refund, compensation and costs.

Rights of the customer and of the business

A customer can ask for the price that was advertised. A customer can also seek a refund and compensation for harm caused by a misleading listing.

A restaurant or an app can defend itself. It can show the listing was clear, or that the buyer was told the real price before ordering. The commission decides on the evidence.

Before you pay at a restaurant booked through an app

  • Screenshot the listing, the offer and the price shown
  • Check if the price is ‘per person’ or ‘cost for two’
  • Ask what taxes and service charge will be added
  • Ask for an itemised bill and read it before paying
  • If the bill is wrong, write ‘paid under protest’ and keep all papers

If this happens to you

  1. Keep proof. Screenshots, booking message, bill and payment receipt.
  2. Ask first. Show the manager the app price and ask for a fix on the spot.
  3. Complain in writing to the restaurant and the app. Ask for a refund and say you will go to the consumer commission if not.
  4. File a consumer case if there is no reply. Read about civil cases in Delhi and how the courts handle them.
  5. For bigger money disputes, read about a Delhi High Court advocate.

Case at a glance

Where
Delhi (North District Consumer Commission)
Who
A customer v. Swiggy and Themis Barbeque House
What
Buffet price at the restaurant was 40 to 47% above the ‘cost for two’ shown on the app
Order
Rs 1 lakh jointly, plus refund of Rs 3,988 and Rs 254 with 9% interest (as reported)
Status
Order dated 4 October 2026; appeal possible

Sources

  1. Order: District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission-I (North), Delhi, CC No. DC/80/CC/422/2024, 21 September 2026
  2. Delhi High Court: National Restaurant Association of India v. Union of India, W.P.(C) 10683/2022, 28 March 2025 (service charge)
  3. India Code: Section 79, Information Technology Act, 2000
  4. Business Today: Misleading buffet price: Delhi consumer court slaps Swiggy, restaurant Rs 1 lakh fine (4 October 2026)
  5. Bombay Samachar: Swiggy Dineout Price Shock: Rs 1 Lakh Ordered After Customer Finds Buffet Bill Far Higher Than App Listing (4 October 2026)
  6. Entertales: Swiggy Ordered To Pay Rs 1 Lakh Over Misleading Buffet Price On Dineout (4 October 2026)
  7. Deccan Herald: Swiggy, restaurant held liable for misleading buffet price, ordered to pay Rs 1 lakh (4 October 2026)

Need legal advice on a similar matter?

Call or WhatsApp +91 9990856569

ShareWhatsAppFacebookX

This explainer is general legal information based on news reports and the text of the law. It is not legal advice on any particular case, and it does not say that any person has committed an offence; allegations are decided by the courts.

Call now